Modern Day Terrorism': How The Online Extremist Network 764 Is Threatening Teen Lives

 

Idaho Governor Brad Little signed House Bill 37 into law on March 12, 2025, designating the firing squad as the state's primary method of execution.

3/17/25

(Old but Newsworthy)

Summary

Idaho Governor Brad Little signed House Bill 37 into law on March 12, 2025, designating the firing squad as the state's primary method of execution, effective July 1, 2026. This decision aligns with his stated support for capital punishment and the Idaho Legislature's policy on execution methods. The bill passed with significant support in both chambers—28–7 in the Senate and 58–11 in the House—though three Republican lawmakers joined all 15 Democrats in opposing it. Idaho is now the only state to authorize the firing squad as its primary execution method, with lethal injection as an alternative.

 

The move follows South Carolina's first firing squad execution in March 2025, marking the first such execution in the U.S. since 2010. Idaho's shift was partly driven by challenges in procuring lethal injection drugs and concerns over botched procedures. Proponents argue the firing squad is humane, quick, and ensures justice for victims, while critics, including Senator Dan Foreman, describe it as inhumane and barbaric.

 

In 2023, Idaho had authorized firing squad executions as an alternative if lethal injection was unavailable. However, the new law makes it the default method. A 2022 secrecy law prevents disclosure of execution team identities or qualifications. Meanwhile, Idaho's last execution was in 2012, and attempts to execute Thomas Creech in 2024 by lethal injection failed due to collapsed veins, leading to a stay of execution. Renovations for an execution preparation room cost $313,915, but constructing a firing squad facility is estimated to cost over $950,000.

Additionally, Idaho passed House Bill 380, expanding the death penalty to include severe cases of aggravated lewd conduct against children aged 12 and under when additional aggravating factors exist. Together, these laws represent a significant shift in Idaho's criminal justice policy, sparking national debate over the state's approach to justice, punishment, and the death penalty's role. Supporters claim the measures emphasize the seriousness of crimes against children, while critics raise constitutional and ethical concerns.

 

Original Article

https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/idaho-governor-signs-legislation-authorizing-firing-squad-as-states-primary-execution-method

────────── ❖ ──────────

The views expressed in this episode are those of the individual host and guests and do not necessarily reflect the official position of David J. Story or The Secret World of Human Trafficking.

While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the validity of all statements made by our guests. This program is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as professional legal, medical, or psychological advice.

For more information, please visit our full disclaimer at DavidJStory.com/Disclaimer.

  

Original

https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/idaho-governor-signs-legislation-authorizing-firing-squad-as-states-primary-execution-method

https://www.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1329488949219363&id=100064748104649&post_id=100064748104649_1329488949219363&rdid=e3j8q6nzm9dmYToJ#

On March 12, 2025, Idaho Governor Brad Little (pic­tured) signed House Bill 37 into law, mak­ing the fir­ing squad the state’s pri­ma­ry method of exe­cu­tion. In a state­ment to Catholic News Agency, Gov. Little said, ​“I have long made clear my sup­port of cap­i­tal punishment…My sign­ing of [this bill] is con­sis­tent with my sup­port of the Idaho Legislature’s actions in set­ting the poli­cies around meth­ods of exe­cu­tion in the state of Idaho.” The bill, which takes effect on July 1, 2026, passed both cham­bers of the Idaho Legislature by wide mar­gins, with a vote of 28 – 7 in the Senate and 58 – 11 in the House. Just three Republican law­mak­ers joined all 15 of their Democratic col­leagues in vot­ing against the bill. As of November 2024, the Idaho Department of Corrections had not begun work on con­struc­tion of a secured facil­i­ty for exe­cu­tions via fir­ing squad, with recent esti­mates for the pend­ing work run­ning as high as $950,000.

Five states — Idaho, Mississippi, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Utah — allow for exe­cu­tion by fir­ing squad. Idaho is the only state that autho­rizes fir­ing squad as its pri­ma­ry method of exe­cu­tion. On March 7, 2025, South Carolina exe­cut­ed Brad Sigmon by fir­ing squad, the state’s first-ever exe­cu­tion by this method and the first exe­cu­tion of its kind in the U.S. since 2010. Per South Carolina law, Mr. Sigmon was tasked with elect­ing his method of exe­cu­tion and ulti­mate­ly chose death by fir­ing squad because of unan­swered con­cerns with the state’s lethal injec­tion pro­to­col and its more than 100-year-old electric chair.

In 2023, the Idaho leg­is­la­ture passed a bill autho­riz­ing fir­ing squad exe­cu­tions as an alter­na­tive method if lethal injec­tion was unavail­able. Under the new bill, the fir­ing squad is now the pri­ma­ry method of exe­cu­tion and lethal injec­tion is the alter­na­tive. A March 2022 secre­cy law pre­cludes the state from dis­clos­ing to both the pub­lic and courts infor­ma­tion about the iden­ti­ties, skills, and qual­i­fi­ca­tions of the indi­vid­u­als on an exe­cu­tion team. Those in sup­port of the new leg­is­la­tion argued in com­mit­tee hear­ings that the fir­ing squad is a humane method of exe­cu­tion and would avoid the state’s issues in procur­ing the drugs need­ed for lethal injec­tion exe­cu­tions. Representative Bruce Skaug, a co-spon­sor of the leg­is­la­tion, told col­leagues in February that ​“At first when you hear fir­ing squad, if you’re not famil­iar with the his­to­ry, you think ​‘well that sounds bar­bar­ic’ is what I’ve heard from some…It is cer­tain. It is quick. And it brings jus­tice for the vic­tims and their fam­i­lies in a more expe­di­tious man­ner than oth­er types.” But Senator Dan Foreman, a vet­er­an and for­mer police offi­cer, and the only Republican sen­a­tor to vote against the bill, expressed con­cerns. ​“Projecting a piece of met­al at 3,200 feet-per-sec­ond, give or take, through the human body is any­thing but humane,” he told his col­leagues. ​“I can say that because I’ve seen it. I wished I hadn’t seen it.”

Others, includ­ing Senator Brian Lenney, claimed that death by fir­ing squad would be ​“instan­ta­neous” and ​“an act of mer­cy.” Sen. Foreman added that ​“the claims that it’s instan­ta­neous. Well, yes — some­times it is, some­times it is not. And if you’ve ever seen that, I think you would change your mind on how you’re about to vote.” Senate Minority Leader Melissa Wintrow said the bill is ​“a move back­ward.” She added, ​“It’s bar­bar­ic, and it unfor­tu­nate­ly puts the optics of Idaho in a place that I don’t think we care to be.”

Idaho’s last exe­cu­tion was car­ried out in 2012. In February 2024, the state attempt­ed to exe­cute Thomas Creech, the longest serv­ing pris­on­er on the state’s death row, by lethal injec­tion. On February 28, 2024, the exe­cu­tion team tried eight times to estab­lish an IV line to admin­is­ter lethal injec­tion drugs to Mr. Creech, insert­ing nee­dles into his hands, feet, and legs, but his veins col­lapsed each time. After an hour of attempts to estab­lish lines, Idaho Department of Corrections (IDOC) offi­cials called off Mr. Creech’s exe­cu­tion. His attor­neys warned IDOC offi­cials that his age (then 73) and med­ical con­di­tions, includ­ing Type 2 dia­betes, hyper­ten­sion, and ede­ma, could impact cir­cu­la­tion and vein qual­i­ty. Idaho set anoth­er exe­cu­tion date for November 2024; how­ev­er, a fed­er­al dis­trict court issued a stay of exe­cu­tion to allow for addi­tion­al time to con­sid­er Mr. Creech’s legal claims.

Ahead of Mr. Creech’s sched­uled November 2024 exe­cu­tions, IDOC under­took ren­o­va­tions to the F Block unit at the Idaho Maximum Security Institution to cre­ate an exe­cu­tion prepa­ra­tion room that cost an esti­mat­ed $313,915, accord­ing to offi­cials. The ren­o­va­tions includ­ed imag­ing, design, and engi­neer­ing out­lined in phase one con­struc­tion to the unit but did not include phase two con­struc­tion costs, includ­ing the cre­ation of a secured facil­i­ty for exe­cu­tions via fir­ing squad. In com­mit­tee hear­ings, law­mak­ers said the ren­o­va­tions to build the fir­ing squad cham­ber would like­ly cost more than the $750,000 the leg­is­la­tors ini­tial­ly ear­marked, but Rep. Skaug indi­cat­ed any addi­tion­al funds would come from IDOC’s bud­get. Reporting from the Idaho Capital Sun in October 2024 indi­cates this con­struc­tion would cost an esti­mat­ed $952,589.

These two laws show exactly how far one state is willing to go to punish the worst crimes against children.

Idaho has passed two separate laws that together represent one of the most significant shifts in criminal justice policy in recent years. The first, HB 37, makes the firing squad the primary method of execution in the state starting July 1, 2026, replacing lethal injection as the default. The second, HB 380, expands the death penalty to include certain severe cases of aggravated lewd conduct against children aged 12 and under, but only when additional aggravating factors are present. The two bills are separate pieces of legislation, but when combined they have been widely discussed as Idaho taking the hardest possible stance on both how executions are carried out and which crimes qualify for the ultimate punishment.

Supporters of the laws argue that the firing squad is a more reliable and humane method of execution than lethal injection, which has faced years of controversy over botched procedures and drug supply issues. They also argue that expanding the death penalty to the most extreme cases of child abuse sends a clear message about how seriously the state takes crimes against children. Critics counter that expanding capital punishment raises serious constitutional concerns, particularly in light of past Supreme Court rulings that have limited the death penalty to cases involving the death of a victim. The debate has drawn national attention and placed Idaho at the center of a much larger conversation about justice, punishment, and the role of the state.

Two laws, two debates, and one state that just redefined how far it is willing to go in the name of justice.